Office of the Executive Vice President and Provost

Faculty Handbook - 9. Faculty Grievance Procedures

View Section as PDF
9.1. Who May File Appeals
9.2. Appeal through Administrative Channels
9.3. Appeal through Faculty Senate Committee on Appeals
  9.3.1. Faculty Senate Committee on Appeals
  9.3.2. Procedures in a Faculty Appeal
  9.3.2.1. Contacting the Committee
  9.3.2.2. Initiating an Appeal
  9.3.2.3. Timing of Initiation of an Appeal
  9.3.3. Appointment of an Ad Hoc Investigative Committee
  9.3.3.1. Ad Hoc Investigative Committee Procedures
  9.3.3.2. The Ad Hoc Investigative Committee Report
  9.3.3.3. Response to the Ad Hoc Investigative Committee Report
  9.3.3.4. Terminating an Appeal
  9.3.4. FSCA Hearing of Case
  9.3.4.1. FSCA Reporting Procedures
  9.3.5. Limitation
  9.3.6. Responsibilities of Provost
  9.3.6.1. Appeal of an Action by the Provost
  9.3.6.2. Appeal of an Action of the President
  9.3.7. Keeping Records
  9.3.7.1. Confidentiality
  9.3.7.2. Archives
  9.3.7.3. Annual FSCA Report
9.4. Amendments

9.1. Who May File Appeals

Faculty members who believe they have been treated unfairly with respect to salary, promotion, tenure, academic concerns, reduction in force, or other matters related to employment may have their cases reviewed formally through the procedures which have been developed by the Faculty Senate and approved by the administration. For purposes of definition, such a call for a review shall hereafter be called an appeal. It is brought by an appellant and is directed at the appellee. Appeals of administrative actions or actions to deny reappointment, promotion or tenure, should be based on grounds that improper procedures were followed, academic freedoms or constitutional rights were violated, policy was interpreted improperly, or arbitrary and capricious criteria were employed in recommending the action being appealed. Section 5.2.4.3.5 determines when an appeal of a promotion or tenure decision may occur, and the information to be considered in such an appeal.

All faculty are eligible to appeal. See section 3.3, Types of Appointments, for further information on types of faculty appointments. Appeals must be initiated no more than 45 B-base faculty working days following the occurrence of the last event or events that are being appealed. The filing of an appeal should not alter any schedule, time limitation, or deadline to which the parties to the appeal would otherwise have been subject in the absence of the filing (e.g., date of termination or date for which tenure is obtained). However, changes in schedules or deadlines may be among the remedies sought by the appellant.

There are two independent channels for the consideration of appeals:

Faculty members may use either channel or both consecutively, but not simultaneously.

9.2. Appeal through Administrative Channels

An appeal through administrative channels is initiated when a written appeal, stating the case, naming the appellee(s), and requesting specific remedies is presented to the administrator or administrative body whose sphere of responsibility includes the events grieved: e.g., a departmental chair, a dean, the provost, the president, or the Board of Regents. Appeals presented initially to the provost or president may be referred to the Faculty Senate Committee on Appeals, where they will be treated as described below.

The administrator or administrative body that receives the appeal shall investigate it and present the appellant(s) and the appellee(s) with a written response within 20 administrative working days from the date the appeal was received. Working days here are defined as days that the university is officially open for business. The written response shall describe the evidence considered, state the decisions made, and review the reasoning that led to the decisions.

The response time for appeals filed near extended periods when classes are not in session or summer session may be modified accordingly to accommodate the availability of the principals and witnesses appropriate to the appeal. Other adjustments may be made in the appeal procedure's time schedule, provided the appellant(s), appellee(s), and the party investigating the appeal agree to them, or, failing that, the approval of the provost is obtained. An appeal through administrative channels may be withdrawn by the appellant(s) any time before the response is received.

9.3. Appeal through Faculty Senate Committee on Appeals

9.3.1. Faculty Senate Committee on Appeals

Established by the Faculty Senate to consider appeals by any faculty member, the Faculty Senate Committee on Appeals (FSCA) is composed of at least 16 faculty members, plus the chairperson who is elected annually by the Faculty Senate. No member may be a departmental, college, or university administrative officer. Details of the committee structure are described in the Faculty Senate Bylaws. The FSCA is a body that investigates and recommends a course of action; it is not an advocate group for faculty members who believe that they have been treated unfairly. When a case is brought to the committee, it is investigated with due consideration given to the appeal and to the counterarguments offered by the appellee(s). Following a confidential committee investigation and discussion of the allegations and pertinent evidence, a committee recommendation is made relative to the remedies sought. These recommendations are sent to the provost for final disposition in the case. If the provost's decision is not acceptable, a faculty member may take the case to the Board of Regents.

No member of the FSCA shall vote on or participate in an investigation of an appeal of an action in which he/she is or has been directly involved. All appeals brought to the committee are handled in the strictest confidence. The committee may develop other rules of procedure subject to approval by a majority vote of the Faculty Senate.

9.3.2. Procedures in a Faculty Appeal

9.3.2.1. Contacting the Committee.

Potential appellants should contact the Faculty Senate Office to obtain the name of the chairperson of the FSCA. In a confidential preliminary conference, the chairperson of the FSCA will advise the potential appellant regarding the appropriate procedures in an appeal process and provide current copies of the FSCA Rules of Procedure. If the faculty member agrees, the chairperson of the FSCA may, at this point, act as an ombudsman to determine if the appeal can be settled by negotiation before proceeding through the steps described below.

9.3.2.2. Initiating an Appeal.

The faculty member must do the following:

If in the judgment of the chairperson the grounds for the appeal are questionable, the FSCA shall vote on whether or not it will consider the case.

9.3.2.3. Timing of Initiation of an Appeal.

Appeals may be initiated at any calendar time within 45 B-base working days of the action/decision being contested. Exceptions to this 45 day limit may be granted at the discretion of the FSCA. If the time available between the submission of the appeal and the beginning of an extended period without classes is insufficient for an investigation and preparation of a final report, the FSCA chairperson may postpone initiating an investigation of an appeal until the end of the first week following that period. The decision to postpone obligates the chairperson to send written notification to appellant(s) and appellee(s). When less than 45 working days are left in a spring semester, an appeal may be held over the summer.

9.3.3. Appointment of an Ad Hoc Investigative Committee

Within five working days of the acceptance of an appeal by the committee, the FSCA chairperson shall appoint an Ad Hoc Investigative Committee of three. The appellant(s) and appellee(s) shall be informed of the Ad Hoc Committee membership. The appellee(s) will be given a copy of the materials submitted by the appellant and a copy of the FSCA Rules of Procedure. The appellant(s) and appellee(s) may each request removal of one member from the Ad Hoc Committee, that member(s) to be replaced by another chosen by the FSCA chairperson. The appellee(s) has five working days to submit to the Ad Hoc Committee a written response to the appellant's request for a Study of an Appeal. A copy of this written response shall be given to the appellant(s).

9.3.3.1. Ad Hoc Investigative Committee Procedures.

The Ad Hoc Committee shall keep a written log when conducting an investigation. It shall, where possible, interview all witnesses specified by the appellant, by appellee(s), and by other principal parties to the appeal. Other persons may, at the discretion of the Ad Hoc Committee, be interviewed. Interviewees may be accompanied by a counselor(s) at their expense. Only the Ad Hoc Committee, its legal counsel, if any, and persons approved by the party being interviewed shall be present during these confidential interviews.

9.3.3.2. The Ad Hoc Investigative Committee Report.

After completing its investigation, the Ad Hoc Committee shall prepare a written report, which shall include a description of the appeal, the relief sought, the evidence appropriate to each allegation in the appeal, and the findings relative to each allegation. Copies of confidential letters of recommendation that were solicited during the process that led to the appeal will not be included in the Ad Hoc Investigative Committee's report. A tentative set of recommendations shall also be prepared. These will be considered separately from the report by the full FSCA. This report and tentative recommendations shall be submitted to the appellant(s), to the appellee(s), and to all FSCA members so that all parties concerned will have no less than five B-base faculty working days to consider the report prior to a meeting of the FSCA called to act on said appeal.

9.3.3.3. Response to the Ad Hoc Investigative Committee Report.

Within this five-day period the appellant(s) and appellee(s) may submit to the chairperson of the FSCA written explanatory statements, stating any disagreements on matters of fact and/or interpretation with the investigative committee's findings. The chairperson shall arrange a reciprocal exchange of explanatory statements between the appellant and appellee as well as distribute such statements to the full committee. Failure by any of the parties to submit an explanatory statement shall be interpreted as acceptance of the factual and interpretive information of the investigative committee's findings.

9.3.3.4. Terminating an Appeal.

At any stage prior to submission of the investigative committee's report, the appellant may request in writing to the FSCA chairperson that consideration of the appeal be terminated. In such a case, the chairperson of the Ad Hoc Investigative Committee shall submit to the FSCA chair and to the appellee, a summary report on the general nature of the appeal and its resolution. This report shall be written so as to maintain confidentiality in the case. Once the Ad Hoc Committee report has been submitted, however, the appellant may not terminate an appeal.

9.3.4. FSCA Hearing of Case

After the five-day period described above, a quorum of the FSCA shall meet in closed session to review the appeal, the Ad Hoc Investigative Committee findings, its recommendations and all written explanatory statements submitted by the appellant(s) and appellee(s). In this discussion, the full FSCA will formulate specific recommendations based on the Ad Hoc Investigative Committee's tentative recommendations regarding disposition of the appeal. Upon returning to open session, a quorum of the FSCA shall vote by secret ballot on the recommendations in the case. Any FSCA member, present for voting, may individually submit any written commentary, corrections, rebuttal, or opinions as to why the recommendations should be accepted or rejected.

9.3.4.1. FSCA Reporting Procedures.

The FSCA recommendations, including a tally of the vote, the investigative findings and attachments, the responses of the appellant(s) and appellee(s), and any concurring or dissenting opinions, shall be submitted by the FSCA chairperson to the provost within 45 B-base faculty working days from the date of the appointment of the Ad Hoc Committee. Adjustments may be made in the time schedule, provided the appellant(s), appellee(s) and the Ad Hoc Investigative Committee agree, or, in the event of no such agreement, with the approval of the FSCA chairperson.

The FSCA chairperson shall also inform the appellant(s) and appellee(s) of the committee's recommendations within five B-base faculty working days of the committee's meeting.

9.3.5. Limitation

Once considered by the committee, an appeal may not be reopened unless there is significant new evidence in the judgment of the FSCA.

9.3.6. Responsibilities of Provost and President

After review of the FSCA report and holding any additional necessary interviews, the provost or a designee shall prepare a written report on the final disposition of the appeal and the university's action in the matter. The FSCA recommendations may be accepted as submitted. If the provost rejects or only partially accepts the recommendations, written reasons must be provided to the FSCA. The provost's signed report shall be addressed to the appellant(s), with copies sent to the appellee(s), and the chairperson of the FSCA within 15 administrative working days (days the university is officially open) from the date of submission of the FSCA recommendations. The chairperson shall inform the FSCA of the response by the provost.

9.3.6.1. Appeal of an Action of the Provost

In cases where the faculty member is appealing an action of the Provost, the Provost's report will not be the final disposition of the appeal, but will be sent together with the FSCA report and recommendation to the Provost for reconsideration of the initial decision. If the Provost's decision is unchanged, the Provost's report and recommendation will be forwarded to the President within 15 working days of submission of the report. The President's report containing his/her decision shall be sent to the faculty member, the Provost, and the chairperson of the FSCA within 15 administrative working days from the date of submission to the President. If the President rejects the appeal, written reasons must be included in the President's report. The FSCA chairperson shall inform the FSCA of the response by the President.

9.3.6.2. Appeal of an Action of the President

In cases where the faculty member is appealing an action of the President, the FSCA recommendation will be submitted to the President who will reconsider the initial action. If the President's initial decision is unchanged, the President will prepare a report containing written reasons for his/her decision. The FSCA report and the President's report will be forwarded to the Board of Regents within 15 administrative days of the submission of the FSCA recommendations. The President's report shall be sent to the faculty member and the chairperson of the FSCA.

9.3.7. Keeping Records

9.3.7.1. Confidentiality.

The proceedings, findings, and recommendations in an appeal are to be held in strict confidence. Such information may be made public only at the request of or by action of the appellant(s). If the appellant(s) or appellee(s) make public material which the FSCA believes to be unfair to people involved in the case, the committee, after consultation with the parties directly involved, may make public such materials as it deems necessary to achieve a fair presentation of the facts.

9.3.7.2. Archives.

The FSCA chairperson shall deposit in the Faculty Senate Office all materials collected in a review of an appeal. After two years, all materials are to be destroyed unless any of the parties to the appeal request that the materials be retained for two additional years. Neither these documents nor any materials pertinent to the appeal shall be placed in the personnel file of the faculty member (s) held by any administrative unit of the university unless the faculty member so requests. The provost may retain all materials submitted in a case for up to five years in a separate appeals file.

9.3.7.3. Annual FSCA Report.

At the end of each academic year, the FSCA chairperson shall submit to the Faculty Senate a written summary report on the general nature of the appeal(s) taken to the provost, indicating whether the recommendations of the committee were accepted, modified, or rejected. This report shall be written so as to maintain the confidentiality of all cases.

9.4. Amendments

Amendments to this policy shall be governed by the same rules which apply to amendments of the Faculty Senate Rules and Bylaws. After amendments are approved by the Faculty Senate, the chairperson of the Faculty Senate Committee on Appeals is responsible for transmitting changes to the Office of the Provost for inclusion in the Faculty Handbook.

Leading Academic Excellence